aggregation
Has our lust for innovation made us move on from ideas too quickly? I’ve been mulling that over for most of the day, since I read Charlie Wurzel’s long piece on Gabe Rivera and Techmeme [https://www.buzzfeed.com/charliewarzel/meet-the-man-who-shapes-techs-narrative] . Unless you’re a blogger of a
Blogging
[https://i2.wp.com/www.onemanandhisblog.com/content/images/2013/01/tell-me-a-tale.jpg] Blogs are narratives. Or, at least, the good ones are. Some are unconciously so, the result of one person naturally expressing the narrative of the ideas they’re exploring in their own lives. Some are very, very
business
[https://i1.wp.com/www.onemanandhisblog.com/content/images/2012/04/keyboard.jpg] I found an interesting piece on content strategy via Stowe Boyd [http://www.stoweboyd.com/post/20404611102/the-rise-of-the-content-strategist-cheryl-lowry-via] this morning. Cheryl Lowry [http://cheryllowry.com/] goes into some detail about the rise of the content strategist [http:
content atomisation
Here’s what’s caught my eye today: - [10 things every journalist should know in 2010](http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2010/01/04/ten-things-every-journalist-should-know-in-2010/) - Kevin Marsh writing about [the end of journalism “as we know it”](http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/jan/04/citizenmedia-bbc)
content atomisation
I think, perhaps, that much of this sense of entitlement is rooted in the fact that magazine or newspaper packages conceal the popularity of each item within – people have to buy the whole package, and it’s hard to determine what they read and what they don’t. (Market research