web 2.0
Back in Seesmic Paid Members Public
I’ve got back into Seesmic [http://www.seesmic.com/] now I have a webcam for my work PC. However, my presentation skills aren’t always what they should be: The service has been revamped somewhat since I last had a play, and the new view which compiles replies in
Le Web 3: Kevin Rose of Digg Paid Members Public
In the fine tradition of Le Web 3 softball interviews, Sarah Lacy [http://www.businessweek.com/bios/Sarah_Lacy.htm] just gave Kevin Rose [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Rose] of Digg [http://www.digg.com] a warm, fluffy loving feeling up on stage, and she asked him again
Bubbleicious Paid Members Public
[Via [Roam4Free](http://blog.roam4free.ie/off-the-richter-scale/)]
One Man and the Cult Paid Members Public
Yes, I have a copy of [*that* book](http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.co.uk%2FCult-Amateur-Internet-Killing-Assaulting%2Fdp%2F1857883934%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Dbooks%26qid%3D1190567495%26sr%3D8-1&tag=fishnefedora-21&linkCode=ur2&camp=1634&creative=6738)
Ask Before You Snap'n'Post Paid Members Public
One of the areas where the lovely Lorna and I tend to disagree is in the whole Web 2.0, life-lived-in-public thing. At her request, the majority of the pictures of my wife that go up on the internet go under some form of privacy protection, such as that on
Reporting An Earth Without Humans Paid Members Public
Here’s a nice example of video from a print title (in this case, Scientific American [http://www.sciam.com/], a competitor to our New Scientist [http://www.newscientist.com/]): It’s the sort of thing that just wouldn’t work well in print, but which makes a great short
Stephen Fry on Web 2.0 Paid Members Public
Nicked shamelessly from Feed Need [http://feedneed.typepad.com/feed_need/2007/08/stephen-fry-on-.html], so as to give me a quota post for the day: VideoJug [http://www.videojug.com/]: Stephen Fry: Web 2.0 [http://www.videojug.com/interview/stephen-fry-web-20]
Commenter Business Meeting 2 Paid Members Public
I quite enjoyed the original “business meeting as internet discussion thread [http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1771556]” video that was doing the rounds some weeks ago. I just discovered that there’s a follow-up which is even funnier. **Warning: **Not safe for work, unless your work is happy with swearing