An interesting (and critical) analysis of the shortcomings of the anecdote-based argument style used by Clay Shirky and others:
On Anecdote as Argument
> But stories and analogies should be a starting point for thought, and not its terminus. They should be the spark that prompts more analytical, more rigorous investigation and introspection, testing out your idea to see where it fits reality and where it fails. In this essay, and in some of his others (see below) anecdotes are all there is, and that’s just not good enough.
[![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](https://i0.wp.com/www.onemanandhisblog.com/content/images/2010/04/reblog_c1.png?w=960)](http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/4104570b-f273-457d-964a-314728ed6121/ "Reblog this post [with Zemanta]")
Adam has been a blogger for over 20 years, and a journalist for more than 25. He currently works as a consultant and trainer, helping people do better, more engaged online journalism.