linguistics
A plural of emoji - linguistically speaking Paid Members Public
The linguistics behind a plural form of “emoji” [http://www.theatlantic.com/notes/2016/01/japanese-and-the-trouble-with-pluralizing-emoji/422967/] This is a fascinating account of count and non-count nouns – and how they’re assimilated into English: > An example is “water,” which has no plural form. To count water, you must refer to
Doge linguistics. Many learnings. Very thinking. Wow Paid Members Public
Such thinkings [http://the-toast.net/2014/02/06/linguist-explains-grammar-doge-wow/]: > A minimal doge utterance contains at least two but often three 2-word doge phrases, followed by a single-word doge phrase (most commonly wow). Additional phrases and variants can be added, especially for the sake of cultural references, such as can’t
