advertorials
So, this happened while I was away: Yes, we need new sources of income in digital. But I’m deeply unconvinced that “native” advertising is the future. We’re essentially running a huge experiment to see if the old view – that compromising editorial values with paid content would erode the
advertising
Copyranter on Buzzfeed’s flavour of native advertising [http://copyranter.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/buzzfeeds-native-advertising-is-nothing.html] : > In an interview with Wired last February, Peretti spouted [http://www.wired.co.uk/magazine/archive/2014/02/features/buzzfeed] about how they “label everything really maniacally” (How does one label an
advertorials
Mumsnet charges you to provide them with content [http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/nick-cohen/2013/12/the-mumsnet-racketeers/]… > I’m sorry, Mumsnet charges writers and actors or their publishers and producers for the privilege of providing content for its website? I shouldn’t have been shocked. The logical next step
