Interesting contrast to The Independent‘s decision.
[![Promotional photograph of Johann Hari](https://i2.wp.com/www.onemanandhisblog.com/content/images/2011/09/Johannhari.jpg?resize=203%2C153)](https://i0.wp.com/commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Johannhari.jpg)Image via [Wikipedia](http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Johannhari.jpg)Comprehensive account by Tom Morris of how [Wikipedia volunteers deal with people who abuse the site](http://blog.tommorris.org/post/10400620996/hari-gate-behind-the-scenes-at-wikipedia), including Mr Hari:
> David r was *banned *in July. Banning is a social measure where the community decides that the person’s invitation to edit the site has been rescinded. You can read David r/Hari’s ban discussion: there were fifteen users who supported a ban (myself included), and three who opposed the ban. David r is banned indefinitely from editing anything on Wikipedia. As we now have confirmation that David r is Johann Hari, Johann Hari is indefinitely banned from Wikipedia. This means that if he pops up with a new account and someone can confirm that the account is a “sockpuppet” used by Hari, that account will be blocked indefinitely on sight. > Who does all this? Volunteers.
[![Enhanced by Zemanta](https://i2.wp.com/www.onemanandhisblog.com/content/images/2011/09/zemified_a3.png?w=960)](http://www.zemanta.com/ "Enhanced by Zemanta")