daily mail
Is Stop Funding Hate an attack on free speech? Paid Members Public
Stop Stop Funding Hate [http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/11/stop-funding-hate-nasty-elitist-campaign-press-censorship/?utm_source=Adestra&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Lunchtime_Espresso_16112016] , says Brendan O’Neill for The Spectator: > SFH’s agitation to pull ads from newspapers is not some simple, good, happy-clappy act of consumer caring. It’s
Your five minute Mail hate Paid Members Public
[https://i0.wp.com/www.onemanandhisblog.com/content/images/2015/03/aggregated-rubbish.jpg] A Gawker piece by James King is doing the rounds today, highlighting the “ripping off” done by the Daily Mail Online [http://tktk.gawker.com/my-year-ripping-off-the-web-with-the-daily-mail-online-1689453286] : > Yes, most outlets regularly aggregate other publications’ work in the quest
Dominant Mail Paid Members Public
Startling figures [https://www.journalism.co.uk/news/abc-mail-online-on-verge-of-reaching-200-million-monthly-visitors-in-december/s2/a563873/] : > ABC figures for December 2014 show the Daily Mail site reached 199.4 million visitors during the month – up 1.4 per cent on its previous monthly record of 196.7 million visitors in November. It remains well above
Now we are eleven... Paid Members Public
This blog is eleven years old today. But really, who cares on a day when: * Mail Online took over Metro Online * Flipboard bought Zite * BBC Three heads to being an online-only channel It’s interesting tracking the relative ages of those things, though. BBC Three is less than a month
Don't feed the Daily Troll Paid Members Public
David Hepworth [http://whatsheonaboutnow.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/how-daily-mail-fishes-in-new.html] : > But I mostly hear about the Daily Mail from the people who disapprove of it most. It’s the daily drum beat of Twitter – what have they gone and done now? These people can’t wait to tell me
Twitter, News and Mob Journalism Paid Members Public
And that’s the key thing to understand about these distributed, mass publication media. They are not inherently good or bad. They are not a force for good or evil, but merely a vehicle in which the voices of the many can be raised for or against something, and, if
Social Networks & Children's Brains Paid Members Public
Ah, nothing like a [rational, calm, provable headline](http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1153583/Social-websites-harm-childrens-brains-Chilling-warning-parents-neuroscientist.html) to boost the public’s trust in journalists.Spotted in Waitrose last night. Debunked [not long after I got home](http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-evidence-aric-sigman-ignored/). Noted: shallow, sensationalist reporting in a
Is the Daily Mail faking comments? Paid Members Public
Charles Arthur makes a compelling case that the Daily Mail is faking positive comments [http://www.charlesarthur.com/blog/?p=930] on its website. Now, I’ve seen members of RBI staff leave comments on our blogs without making explicit who they are, but this level of sock-puppetry [http://en.